SUED BIN HUSIN
Constituencies (0)
Electoral track record
| Year | Party | Votes | % | Majority | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1995 | S46 | 256 | — | — | Lost |
Connections (2)
News sentiment over time
17 mentions across 3 months
News mentions
Trump’s legal crusade against news media falters in US courts: ‘No realistic expectation to prevail’
Donald Trump’s early legal wins against broadcasters ABC and CBS have given way to defeats and retreats as courts and newsrooms act to protect press freedom.
Why you’re seeing this: Mentions SUED BIN HUSIN
Amri Che Mat’s wife fails to set aside stay on probe
Justice Alwi Abdul Wahab held that the appellate court had no reason to interfere with the judicial commissioner’s exercise of discretion. “This will not prejudice the wife’s (Norhayati Ariffin) pursuit of justice (for Amri). It is just a temporary delay,” he said. The other judges who sat with him were Justices Shahnaz Sulaiman and Amarjeet Singh. No order was made regarding costs. Last year, the High Court found the police liable for breaching their statutory duties and acting unconstitutionally in the probe into Amri’s disappearance. It ordered the government to pay RM2 million in general damages, RM1 million in exemplary damages, as well as special damages of RM14,457.52 to his family. However, the enforcement of the judgment was stayed pending the government’s appeal to the Court of Appeal, which will be heard on Nov 30. Amri, founder of the NGO Perlis Hope, left his home at about 11.30pm on Nov 24, 2016. His car was found at a construction site at the Bukit Cabang Sports School in Perlis early the next morning. Norhayati later sued the government and the police over the manner in which they investigated his disappearance. Lawyer Surendra Ananth appeared for Norhayati while senior federal counsel Zetty Zurina Kamaruddin represented the government and police. Earlier today, Surendra told the court that all Norhayati wanted was closure regarding Amri’s whereabouts and for the court to order a fresh investigation to commence with a new team of officers, as this would provide some accountability. “The High Court also made a finding that since the task force report was completed in 2020, nothing was done by the police (to further probe Amri’s disappearance). “The investigating officer ( Khor Yi Shuen ) who admitted negligence was even promoted to senior officer,” he added. Zetty however insisted that the police had never closed its investigation. On Nov 30, the Court of Appeal will also hear both parties’ arguments on the correctness of the High Court order to remove Khor and several officers from Amri’s case. Stay current - Follow FMT on WhatsApp, Google news and Telegram Subscribe to our newsletter and get news delivered to your mailbox.